FSC vs PEFC

The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) are two of the leading certification programs for sustainably managed forests. Both programs have the goal of promoting responsible forest management practices and protecting the world’s forests for future generations.

One key difference between FSC and PEFC is their scope. FSC is a global certification program that operates in over 80 countries, while PEFC is primarily focused on Europe and has a more limited geographical reach.

Another difference is the way in which the two programs are structured. FSC has a decentralized structure, with separate national and regional organizations responsible for implementing the certification standards in different parts of the world. PEFC, on the other hand, has a more centralized structure, with a single international organization responsible for overseeing the certification process.

Both FSC and PEFC have strict standards for sustainably managed forests, including requirements related to the protection of forests, the rights of indigenous peoples, and the conservation of biodiversity. Both programs also require that certified forests be independently audited on a regular basis to ensure compliance with the standards.

One key similarity between FSC and PEFC is that they both recognize each other’s certification programs. This means that forests that are certified by one program are also recognized by the other, which can make it easier for companies to source sustainably managed wood and paper products.

In summary, FSC and PEFC are two of the leading certification programs for sustainably managed forests. While they have some differences in terms of scope and structure, they both have strict standards and require independent audits to ensure compliance. They also recognize each other’s certification programs, which can make it easier for companies to source sustainably managed wood and paper products.